🔗 Share this article

Market specialists have shown deep skepticism regarding bullish claims that American oil giants will rapidly invest vast sums of dollars to rebuild the country's broken production facilities.

The Need for Iron-Clad Guarantees

Without an absolute assurance of complete repayment from the Washington, experts believe international firms to act with great care.

“It seems hasty to discuss any potential investments,” a spokesperson commented this weekend.

The ambitious timeframe of less than a year and a half was publicly proposed. Nevertheless, expert analyses indicate a different picture.

A Likely Outlook

“It’s probably going to take 36 months for any kind of output increase,” noted an industry expert.

Experts believe oil companies would likely spend:

• Year one: Securing new regulatory frameworks.
• Following phase: Investing in rebuilding of infrastructure.
• Final phase: Starting to significantly ramp up output.

This suggests an boost of around 500,000 bpd possibly by the end of the decade.

Desire Versus Readiness for Investment

There is a important separation between firms' attention and their readiness to commit heavily.

“I believe their curiosity is an high score, on a scale of one to 10. But their appetite is a four or five, because there is a lack of certainty yet.”

Veteran operators in the region echo this caution. They believe that majors will publicly express enthusiasm while privately acting with extreme caution.

The Vast Cost

The monetary bill would be vast. Independent analysis suggest that increasing production by between 500,000 and a million barrels per day would require over $10 billion in investment over two to three years.

Yet, returning output to previous levels of around 2.5 million bpd could require a massive $80 billion to $90 billion over many more years.

The Pending Question of Government Backing

The idea of firms being reimbursed by the US taxpayer has been repeatedly mentioned. Nevertheless, formal assurances on this proposal have not yet been provided.

This lack of certainty is the primary factor for the sector's caution. Companies seek protection against nationalization and the risk that a different president could refuse any promise.

“They must be insured against political change, that we’ve witnessed in Venezuela already.”

In summary, while political promises runs high, the operational challenges suggest a road of extreme caution for any major financial commitment in the country's energy industry.